Module 3 entry

Module 3

1-What strengths were highlighted in the results of our multiple intelligence test?
2-How do I interpret these results?
3-What technologies might I incorporate to augment your personal learning based on these results?

1-My results from Garner’s Multiple Intelligences test indicated that my strengths were logical-mathematical (31), bodily-kinesthetic (28), spatial-visual (27), and intrapersonal (25).

2- I was not surprised by any of the results. I interpret the results to mean that I work and learn best when instructions are logical, presented in an organized fashion, and incorporates a variety of physical and visual approaches. I have found this to be accurate. If information is not presented in a logical and organized manner I have decreased synthesis of information. I am unable to move forward until I have rearranged the content into a manner that I can connect with. I also enjoy the physical aspects of activities. Using all of my senses assists me to unite the experience more thoroughly. Being a “generation X’er” I have found that I am more independent, pessimistic, prefer to work alone, self-reliant and unhappy until tasks are completed (Billings & Halstead, 2005). As I have become older I realize that I can be quite content on my own. I do enjoy time with friends and family but like the peace and quiet of my own thoughts. This allows for personal reflection and discovery, supporting the intrapersonal intelligence finding.

3-Recently I have begun using many different forms of technology. I currently have a Blackberry that allows access to many applications including, Epocrates (drug dosing and information software), Google (for general questions), email, date planner, and task manager. This form of technology allows me to be current on class information and keep drug information close at hand. I have also enjoyed using Web CT. Web CT allows for access to curricula at anytime, (except Sunday mornings when I inevitably need to retrieve information). I also appreciate the Web CT classrooms. I have ‘attended’ several review sessions that did not require leaving the comfort of my home office. I appreciated that questions could be asked and answered in real-time.
Intermountain Health Care (IHC) has converted much of their education to computer-based training. I have found this method to have positives and negatives. Hebda and Czar (2009) found that computer based training can streamline instruction but should not totally replace clinical education. I appreciate the streamlined, self-paced independent learning but because I am a bodily-kinesthetic learner ‘hands-on’ reinforcement is still necessary.

References
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2005). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (2nd Edition ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

Hebda, T., & Czar, P. (2009). Handbook of informatics for nurses and healthcare professionals (4th Edition ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.